Legal Opinion

State v. Weaver

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 19, 2003No. COA02-931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

This appeal arises out of defendant Ronald Weaver’s conviction for bribery of a public officer. Defendant contends primarily that the trial court erred (1) in admitting the out-of-court statements of his co-defendant offering the alleged bribe; and (2) in admitting into evidence a district court conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia that had been appealed to superior court. Because we find that the co-defendant’s statements were not hearsay but rather verbal acts and because Rule 609 permits admission of the conviction, we find no error in defendant’s trial.

Facts

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. United States v. Robert Moss (92-1132) Ronald Kohn (92-1136) Joann Climpson (92-1144) and Randy Richardson (92-1155)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. State v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. SantiagoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API