Legal Opinion
Matoush v. Lovingood
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 3, 2008No. 06SC823Published
1Opinion of the Court
177 P.3d 1262 (2008)
Carol S. MATOUSH, Petitioner
v.
David H. LOVINGOOD and Debra Lovingood, Respondents.
No. 06SC823.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
March 3, 2008.
Howard Morrison, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Attorney for Petitioner.
Felt, Monson & Culichia, LLC, James W. Culichia, David M. Shohet, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Attorneys for Respondents.
Justice BENDER delivered the Opinion of the Court.
I. Introduction
In this adverse possession case, we review the court of appeals' opinion in Matoush v. Lovingood, 159 P.3d 741 (Colo.App. 2006).[1] There, the court of appeals concluded that the…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Lakeview Associates, Ltd. v. MaesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Castle Associates v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Spiegel v. FerraroNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.