Legal Opinion
Raiser v. Brigham Young University
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 29, 2005No. 04-4025PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
PORFILIO, Circuit Jhdge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
*410Plaintiff Aaron Raiser, appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s interlocutory order denying his motion to proceed under a pseudonym in his civil rights complaint against defendant Brigham Young University (“BYU”). We entered a show-cause order directing the parties to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Doe No. 2 v. KolkoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- In re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Doe v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Doe v. Pittsylvania CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012
- Raiser v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.