Legal Opinion

Hirschfeld v. Total Health Systems, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 9, 1991No. CV 90-3544 (ADS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

In this action, the plaintiffs allege securities fraud in violation of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78j [1988]), and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Commission. The defendants Total Health Systems, Inc. and Jay A. Fabrikant now move to dismiss the Complaint, pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure, on two grounds: (1) statute of limitations; and (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion is granted.

BACK…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Croce v. V.I.P. Real Estate, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  2. Isanaka v. Spectrum Technologies USA Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2001
  3. Leach v. Quality Health Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Hirschfeld v. Total Health SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API