Legal Opinion
Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Mills
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 27, 1999No. 99 CIV. 1041(BDP)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff, Sprint Spectrum, L.P. (“Sprint”), commenced this action under the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of the Act as well as of various constitutional provisions. Before this Court is plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief pursuant to Rule 65(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, directing the New York State Department of Education to approve its application to install at the Ossining High School an antenna for the wireless telephone service plaintiff…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tom Doherty Associates, Inc. D/B/A Tor Books v. Saban Entertainment, Inc. And Saban International N.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Paul Jolly v. Thomas Coughlin, Robert Greifinger, John P. Keane, C. Greiner, S. KapoorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Town of LaGrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- TCG New York, Inc. v. City of White Plains, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Common Council of City of PeekskillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Vertical Broadcasting, Inc. v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.