Legal Opinion

Howard v. McClane

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1941No. Appeal, 231PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This appeal in a workmen’s compensation ease is by the defendant employer, J. S. Arthur and Company, and its insurance carrier, from a judgment entered in the court below upon an award of compensation to Jesse H. Howard, Sr., and his wife, Mary L. Howard, as the partially dependent parents of their son, Jesse H. Howard, Jr., nineteen years of age, who was fatally burned on February 23, 1938, when he was accidentally “caught in a slide of hot red dog,” during the course of his employment.

The case has had a somewhat involved, and from a legal point of view interesting,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilbert v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Second Injury Reserve AccountSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Williams v. John B. Kelly Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Kelly Et Ux. v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Bucci Et Ux. v. Lincoln Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Metalko v. Ford Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leipziger v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Fitzpatrick v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Greap v. OberdorffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Behanna v. MeyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Gaich v. Kerlin Construction Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API