Legal Opinion

Behanna v. Meyers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1948No. Appeal, 149PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Fine, J.,

Where an injured employe has on numerous occasions discussed his claim for workmen’s compensation with his employer in an effort to secure information to enable him to file a timely report, has been continuously assured by his employer that the report would be filed, has at the request of the insurer signed a statement of the nature and cause of the accident, has complied with insurer’s request for a medical examination and has submitted to ten weeks continuous medical treatment, did the board err in holding that the employer and insurer were estopped from asserting the bar…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Kline v. KiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Horton v. West Penn Power Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Demmel v. Dilworth Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Meyers v. Lehigh Valley Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Palmer v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Harris v. Bechtel CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ex Parte YoungbloodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. NiemannCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Dennis v. E. J. Lavino & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API