Legal Opinion
McGlasson v. Long Term Disability Coverage for All Active Full-Time & Part-Time Employees
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 11, 2016No. 2:15-cv-01512 JWSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
[Re: Motions at Docket 14 & 27]
JOHN W. SEDWICK, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
L MOTION PRESENTED
At docket 14, Defendants The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”), Long Term Disability Coverage for All Active Full-Time and Part-Time Employees, other than those classified by the Employer as Pilots, who are U.S. residents and whose Total Annual Cash Compensation is between $60,000 and $199,999, excluding temporary and seasonal Employees, an ERISA benefit plan (the “Plan”), and JPMorgan Chase Bank (“JPMorgan”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move to dismiss…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hancock v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Hancock v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Gerald S. v. Moda HealthDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Physicians Surgery Center of Chandler v. Cigna Healthcare IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021