Legal Opinion

Lauriedale Associates, Ltd. v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1992No. A051694PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, J.

The primary issue in this case is straightforward. May the developers of a condominium complex, who have been sued for construction defects by a homeowners association, cross-complain against individual unit owners for equitable indemnity? Under the facts of this case, we conclude the answer is “no.”

I. Factual and Procedural Background

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a demurrer was sustained without leave to amend. We, thus, recite the facts as set forth in the pleadings.

The Lauriedale Homeowners Association (Association) is a California nonprofit corporation…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Raven's Cove Townhomes, Inc. v. Knuppe Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. GEM Developers v. Hallcraft Homes of San Diego, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. McBride v. BoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Falk v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
  3. Melchior v. New Line Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  5. Cruz v. PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API