Lauriedale Associates, Ltd. v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSON, J.
The primary issue in this case is straightforward. May the developers of a condominium complex, who have been sued for construction defects by a homeowners association, cross-complain against individual unit owners for equitable indemnity? Under the facts of this case, we conclude the answer is “no.”
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a demurrer was sustained without leave to amend. We, thus, recite the facts as set forth in the pleadings.
The Lauriedale Homeowners Association (Association) is a California nonprofit corporation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Raven's Cove Townhomes, Inc. v. Knuppe Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- GEM Developers v. Hallcraft Homes of San Diego, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- McBride v. BoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Falk v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Melchior v. New Line Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Cruz v. PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.