Legal Opinion

Burbic Contracting Co., Inc. v. Cement Asbestos Prod. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 8, 1982No. 80-218, 80-218APublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cement Asbestos Products Company (CAPCO), a manufacturer and supplier of pipe, brought suit against Burbic Contracting Company for the price of materials sold to it under an oral agreement. Burbic, in its answer, asserted that the pipes were defective and developed leaks and counterclaimed against CAPCO. CAPCO claimed that the pipe in question was not defective and that the leaks were caused by the improper installation of the pipes by Burbic's employees. As Burbic's surety for a portion of CAPCO's claim against Burbic, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company was also named as a defendant.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Murray v. Holiday Rambler, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Frank E. Dorton and J. A. Castle, Partners, D/B/A the Carpet Mart v. Collins & Aikman Corporation and Painter Carpet Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. Roto-Lith, Ltd. v. F. P. Bartlett & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
  5. Wayne Robbins v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kennedy Elec. Co. v. Moore-Handley, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Lapeyrouse Grain Corp. v. TallantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. LairdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc. v. Cobasys, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009
  5. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API