Legal Opinion

People v. Spencer

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1947No. Crim. 4066PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County, appellant herein, Willie Lee Dandridge, together with Clarence Vollis Spencer and Walter Latimore, were charged in two counts with the crime of robbery allegedly committed on February 28 and March 4, 1946, respectively, in the county of Los Angeles.

Appellant entered pleas of not guilty to each count charged in the information. Trial before the court, sitting without a jury, resulted in the conviction of appellant on both counts, which the court found to be robbery of the first degree. A motion for a new trial was denied.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Associated Press v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hurd v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. ReingoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. State v. KelseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. ChapinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API