Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel P. Ross
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 29, 2001No. 00-3278Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
245 F.3d 577 (6th Cir. 2001)
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Daniel P. Ross, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-3278
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Argued: October 31, 2000
Decided and Filed: March 29, 2001
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland. No. 96-00065, Donald C. Nugent, District Judge.[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Jack Sammon, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH, Daniel S. Goodman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, APPELLATE SECTION, CRIMINAL DIVISION, Washington, D.C., Jack Sammon, UNITED STATES…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Sargus; Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Lewis J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.