Legal Opinion

Scenic Heights Development Corp. v. Harry

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 7, 1963No. 21958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.

Motion has been made to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that the bill of exceptions contains no proper assignment of error, the sole assignment of error being too general and indefinite to present any question for decision by this court. The bill of exceptions recites that the instant case is “a common-law action in ejectment in the fictitious form,” that it was “returnable to the May term, 1962 of the Superio’Court of Meriwether County,” that “prior to the May term of said superior court, [defendant] filed its disclaimer to any land in Land Lot Number 211 of the Gill…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Patterson v. BeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Cunningham & Co. v. CuretonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. National Bank v. Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  4. Foy v. McCrarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Cates v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. SCENIC HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. HarrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Harry v. SCENIC HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API