Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Harry v. SCENIC HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 7, 1965No. 22709PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Presiding Justice.

This court has considered previous litigation between the parties in the present case. See Harry v. Scenic Heights Development Corp., 218 Ga. 352 (127 SE2d 898); Scenic Heights Development Corp. v. Harry, 218 Ga. 695 (130 SE2d 215); Scenic Heights Development Corp. v. Harry, 219 Ga. 253 (132 SE2d 711).

In an action in ejectment for the recovery of land the petition should describe the land with such accuracy that a writ of possession may issue thereon in the event the plaintiff should recover. Harwell v. Foster, 97 Ga. 264 (22 SE 994); Guess v. Morgan, 196 Ga. 265, 273…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guess v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Harwell v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Jackson v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Stringer v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Martin v. Oakhurst Development Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thornton v. North American Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Turner v. Amsouth Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Godwin v. HarvellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Godwin v. HarvellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API