Legal Opinion

United States v. Eli

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 5, 2002No. CRIM.97-0292 (PLF). No. CIV.A.99-0864 (PLF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

Defendant Alfred Eli has filed a motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He contends that his court appointed counsel was constitutionally ineffective during the plea proceedings and at sentencing in this case. Defendant also has filed two motions raising issues based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). After the Court appointed new counsel for Mr. Eli, the parties appeared before the Court for an evidentiary hearing and for argument on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Eli, AlfredCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. RamseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  3. United States v. GrossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. United States v. MooreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API