Legal Opinion
United States v. Ramsey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 1, 2004No. CR. 95-0326(PLF). No. CIV.A. 00-2066(PLF)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant Charles W. Ramsey’s motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pursuant to that section, the Court shall vacate a conviction and grant, appropriate relief where, inter alia, “there has been such a denial or infringement of the constitutional rights of the prisoner so as to render the judgment vulnerable to collateral attack.” Mr. Ramsey claims that the deficient performance of his trial attorney denied him the “assistance of counsel” guaranteed him by the Sixth Amendment.'
The Court has considered the briefs…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Ramsey v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Middleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Escobedo v. LundDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
- Ramsey, Jr. v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.