Legal Opinion

Pitman v. Sweeney

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 29, 1983No. 4679-6-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoe, C.J.

This appeal concerns an access easement. The parties own adjoining parcels of land. Pitman purchased his property in the spring of 1968 from Bonanza Ranches. Sweeney and Sylte (hereinafter Sweeney) purchased their property from Turk in June 1969. The sale agreement between Turk and Sweeney included the following:

Except Therefrom rights of way for roads, including road crossing from West to East.

Prior to Sweeney's purchase and for many years thereafter, plaintiff Pitman used a road located on the Sweeney parcel for access to his land. Although in June of 1977, Sweeney informed Pitman he could…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. North American Non Metallics, Ltd. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aszmus v. NelsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Springob v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Minton v. LongCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. Shirley v. ShirleySupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  5. Springob v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API