Legal Opinion
United States v. William Bernard Hardy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 26, 2002No. 01-50328PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The mandate issued February 26, 2002 is hereby recalled for the purpose of amending the opinion. The opinion filed February 4, 2002 is hereby amended as follows:
At slip opinion page 1768, ¶ 1, at the end of the sentence reading “Had the court valued loss ... and a lower sentencing range,” add a new footnote 3:
If each “Titan A.E.” DVD is valued at one and twelve hundredths of a cent less than the suggested retail price, the total loss valuation will be less than $70,000 (540 x $26.98 + 2,220 x $24.9688 = $69,999.94). Under this valuation, Har dy is potentially eligible for alternative…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Fernando Vizcarra-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Aundre Sterling WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Orm HiengCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Christopher Eric McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Laura Wasz and Bruce WaszCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.