Legal Opinion

United States v. Orm Hieng

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 2012No. 09-10401PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge WALLACE; Concurrence by Judge BERZON.

OPINION

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:

Orm Hieng appeals from his conviction and sentence (1) for conspiring to manufacture and distribute more than 1,000 plants of marijuana and (2) for manufacturing and cultivating, and aiding and abetting the cultivation of more than 1,000 marijuana plants. Hieng was convicted by a jury and sentenced by the district court to ten years’ imprisonment, the minimum sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(vii). Hieng moved for relief from the statutory minimum under the “safety valve” of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f),…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Doug Lair v. Steve BullockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Anthony GadsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Michael Murray v. Mayo ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Esteban Aleman Gonzalez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API