State v. Hinshaw
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dickinson District Court. — James DeLaND, Judge. Suit in equity for an accounting. Tbe defendant was fisb • and game warden of tbe state, and tbe suit is to recover funds claimed to bave been received by defendant and belonging to tbe state. Tbe trial court dismissed tbe petition, and tbe State appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.
I. From April 1, 1913, until April 10, 1919, appellee held tbe office of fisb and game warden of this state.
l. ootiobrs : ao-ofUsUteSlsReana game warden. It is contended that be received funds from three different sources, for wbicb be should be held to account to tbe state. It is contended that appellee charged and collected from fisher-mei1 a ^ee $10 for permits to take so-called fish” from state waters, and that some $800 was received in this way and not paid over to tbe state. Code Supplement, 1913, Section 2546, provides in part as follows:
* * tbe warden may, upon proper application in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burlingame v. Hardin CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carter v. JerniganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex inf. Taylor v. CumptonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Borlin v. Civil Service Com'n of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Carter v. JerniganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.