Hare v. Murphy
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Lincoln county. Tried below before Neville, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff, as assignee and owner of two promissory notes, and a mortgage on certain real estate given to secure *810their payment, instituted this action against the defendant, to whom the real estate had been sold by the grantee or party purchasing from the mortgagor, to recover the amount due upon the notes and mortgage, basing the suit upon a clause in the conveyance of the lands to defendant, by which it is claimed defendant assumed and agreed on his part to pay the mortgage indebtedness. The petition in the ease recites that on December 26, 1889, D. A. Spraul executed and delivered to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dean v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Doll v. CrumeNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Sample v. HaleNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Barnett v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Shamp v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. BushnellTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Fry v. AusmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- McDonald v. FinsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Enos v. SangerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.