Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tecumseh National Bank v. Saunders

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1897No. 7028Published

Motion by defendant in error for rehearing of case reported in 50 Neb., 521.

1DissentNorval, J.

Being unable to concur in the conclusion reached by the majority upon the applications for rehearings in this and the several cases submitted therewith, I will briefly state my views upon the question involved.

The actions were against the Tecumseh National Bank, as successor of the Bank of Russell & Holmes, to recover moneys deposited by the several plaintiffs in the last 'named bank. The petition in each case filed in the court below is substantially the same as the one construed in Austin v. Tecumsch Nat. Bank, 49 Neb., 412, which was held not to state a cause of action. Doubtless, to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. In re the Senate of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  3. State v. SwiftIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Thompson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. In re Senate File 31Nebraska Supreme Court · 1889

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API