Legal Opinion

City of Bartlesville v. Ambler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1971No. 43192PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY, Judge:

At the time this suit was commenced, plaintiffs owned fourteen residential properties in Pennington Hills Second and Third Additions to the City of Bartlesville. Turkey Creek meanders through parts of these additions; plaintiffs’ back yards are adjacent to this creek. As a part of a flood control project, Defendant City of Bartlesville planned to co-operate with the United States Corps of Engineers in the construction of a drainage ditch to replace the natural channel of Turkey Creek. Plaintiffs’ back yards would be adjacent to the completed drainage ditch.

According to plans…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Town of Ames v. WybrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Watkins v. Bd. of Com'rs of Stephens CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Langston City v. GustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lindhorst v. WrightCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Kiely v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. B.H. v. Gold Fields Mining Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007
  4. Howard v. Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Manuel v. Oklahoma City UniversityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API