Legal Opinion
United States v. Kandlis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1970No. Nos. 24775, 24783, 24784 and 25482PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
The four appellants were each charged with violations of 21 U.S.C. § 176a and 26 U.S.C. § 4744(a). They were tried before a jury, found guilty on the 21 U.S.C. § 176a charge, and each was sentenced under the Youth Corrections Act. Their common contention is that the trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence that marihuana was found in the car in which they were riding, as *134the product of an illegal search. We reverse.
Lukeville, Arizona is a tiny town on the Arizona-Mexico border next to the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, where state highway No. 85, coming…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden v. William Eugene PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. SardoArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. Michael Walter MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Hal Findley MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- State v. BucciniArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. EndresonArizona Supreme Court · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.