Legal Opinion
Glaser v. Wound Care Consultants, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 2, 2009No. 07-4036PublishedCited by 166 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.
Carol Glaser received medical treatment from Wound Care Consultants and was later contacted by an attorney who told her that Wound Care might have improperly billed Medicaid for her treatment. She filed this qui tam action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730, seeking recovery as a relator foi money the government paid as a result of alleged false or fraudulent Medicare and Medicaid claims submitted by Wound Care. But the government was already aware of the possible improprieties in Wound Care’s billing practices and had commenced an investigation more…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chen-Cheng Wang, AKA C.C. Wang, an Individual and Ex Rel. The United States of America v. Fmc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. Hafter v. Spectrum Emergency Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Maurice Lewis v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States Ex Rel. Berkowitz v. Automation Aids, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Acacia Mental Health Clinic, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Mark A. Campbell v. Kevin KallasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.