Legal Opinion
Pesce v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 14, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff City of New York and the third-party defendant Arthur Tickle Engineer Works, Inc., separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.), dated August 12, 1987, which, inter alia, upon a jury verdict determining the issue of liability in favor of the plaintiffs and apportioning liability at 10% against the city and 90% against Arthur Tickle Engineer Works, Inc., and the denial of each of their respective motions for judgment during trial (see, CPLR 4401) and to set aside…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Tomassi v. Town of UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fowle v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Perez v. City of PeekskillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995