Legal Opinion

Perez v. City of Peekskill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, (1) the defendant City of Peekskill appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), dated October 14, 1993, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it and (2) the plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the same order as denied his motion to strike the City of Peekskill’s third affirmative defense.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Bay Ridge Obstetrical & Gynecological AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Billsborrow v. Dow Chemical, U.S.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Pesce v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rubinfeld v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Morales v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API