Legal Opinion
Saysana v. Gillen
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 22, 2009No. 09-1179PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
In 2007, Houng Saysana was taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) and held without bond. After agency proceedings in which bond was again denied, he filed this petition for habeas corpus in the district court, challenging the conclusion of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “Board”) that he is subject to the mandatory detention provision in 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c). The district court concluded that the Board had misinterpreted the statute, and it granted the writ. The Government timely appealed. Because we conclude that the Government has…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Reid v. DonelanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Sylvain v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Gayle v. Warden Monmouth County Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- SAYSANA v. GillenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Castañeda v. SouzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.