Legal Opinion

Goodin v. City of Glendora

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 18, 2019No. Case No. CV 17-3567 FMO (PLAx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge

Having reviewed and considered the parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 53, "Joint Br."), filed by plaintiff Jeffrey Goodin ("Goodin" or "plaintiff") and defendants City of Glendora ("City"), Detective Crawford ("Crawford"), Detective Ziino ("Ziino"), Lieutenant Demond ("Demond"), Sergeant Amaro ("Amaro"), Officer Stein ("Stein"), Officer Howell ("Howell"), Sergeant Barrett ("Barrett"), and Sergeant Gold ("Gold") (collectively, "defendants"), and all accompanying briefs and exhibits, the court finds that oral argument is not…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beeman v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  2. Christopher Prevedello v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
  3. Cornell Miles II v. City of Sacramento, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  4. Dominguez v. AbaciDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API