Legal Opinion
Beeman v. City of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 31, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00457Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANE BEEMAN, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00457-RBM-DDL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 13 v. LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 15 Defendants. [Doc. 67] 16 17 Currently pending before the Court is a motion for leave to file a second amended 18 complaint (“SAC”) filed by Plaintiff Shane Beeman (“Plaintiff”), who is appearing pro se. 19 (Doc. 67 (hereinafter “Motion” or “Mot.”).) Defendants City of San Diego, the San Diego 20 Police Department, and Dave Gibson (“Defendants”)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.