Legal Opinion

Hix v. Guillot

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 25, 1991No. A14-89-1066-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

This is a subrogation suit brought pursuant to former Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 8307, § 6a. 1 New York Underwriters Insurance Company filed suit against appel lant, an alleged third-party tortfeasor, to recover sums which it paid to Gerald James Guillot as workers’ compensation benefits. Following, a trial before the bench, the court below entered judgment for appel-lees. In two points of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment and rendering judgment for appellees, because the subrogation action was barred by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Texas Employers Insurance v. BrandonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Texas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Yeary v. HinojosaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Buss v. RobisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guillot v. HixTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Los Fresnos Consolidated Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API