Legal Opinion

Hand v. Twin Falls County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

-This action was brought by respondent to have decreed void and canceled a tax deed, from appellant Twin Falls county to appellant Clark, of land embraced in the rejected area of the Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Company Carey Act project, as to which project most of the necessary facts are recited in the case of Leney v. Twin Falls County, ante, p. 600, 236 Pac. 532, jnst decided by this court. This case was submitted with the argument therein. The facts were- presented by a stipulation, and with the differences hereinafter pointed out, were largely the same as those in the Leney case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Miller v. ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Shires v. BoggessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Russo v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  5. Paulsen v. Western Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Village of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Kittle v. LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Vollmer v. VollmerIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Harsin v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Mastrangelo v. Sandstrom, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API