Legal Opinion

Shires v. Boggess

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1913PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Monroe County. Action by Minerva Shires against W. B. Boggess. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge:

We have tbis case before us for th'e second time. Formerly we reversed the judgment and remanded the case for a new trial. 68 W. Va. 137.

The declaration is good in form, and the demurrer was properly overruled.. The first assignment of error is, therefore, without merit.

The next point is that during the trial, the court permitted plaintiff to amend her declaration, by inserting in the two blank ' spaces the figures "$50.00”, covering, first, the amount necessarily laid out and expended in endeavoring to be cured; second, the amount .necessarily laid out and expended for nurs'es…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. BrownfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Mylius v. Raine-Andrew Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Thompson v. MannWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Travis v. Peabody InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hampton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Feliciano v. 7-Eleven, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Farmers & Mechanics Mutual Insurance Co. of West Virginia v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Nesbitt v. FlaccusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Moore v. Skyline Cab, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API