Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Citizens Gas & Coke Utility

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided January 18, 2007No. 1:03-cv-01882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BARKER, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth in this entry, we hold that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment should be granted and that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted in part and denied in part.

Factual Background

Eight of the ten Plaintiffs are hourly employees of Defendant, Citizens Gas & Coke Utility (“Citizens”) who work in its manufacturing division and are represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. INDIANAPOLIS CHAPTER OF NAACP v. BallardDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2010
  2. TYLER v. CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API