Legal Opinion

Barber v. Emporium Partnership

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1990No. 880410PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Appellants challenge a trial court order renewing a judgment against them and dismissing their counterclaim and third-party claim. They also challenge a judgment for sanctions against their attorney. We affirm but vacate the renewal of the judgment against Don White.

This ease has a long and tortured history. Appellees Norman and Helen Barber originally filed a complaint in January 1979, seeking payment of a promissory note executed by appellants Von Stocking and Don White as general partners of The Emporium Partnership. In a judgment dated April 18, 1979, the trial court found…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Joan Morton, Debtor. Joan Morton v. National Bank of New York CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Palle v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Utah Farm Production Credit Ass'n v. LabrumUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Marine Midland Bank v. HerriottMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. McCune & McCune v. Mountain Bell TelephoneUtah Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. R & R Energies v. Mother Earth Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sanchez v. SaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Lachter v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  4. O'LANE v. SpinneyNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Guertler v. Barlow Woods, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API