Camp v. Cronkright
New York Supreme Court
Case submitted on agreed statement. Submission of controversy without action on statement of facts agreed upon, by Hugh H. Camp against Charles Cronkright, Philip F. dwell, (individually and as executor of Philip Malone, deceased,) Patrick dwell, Bridget dwell, and Patrick Malone.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
Charles M. Connolly died seised of certain premises, leaving him surviving Isabella S. Connolly, his widow, and the following children, his only heirs at law: James A. Connolly, Washington A. Connolly, Thomas B. Connolly, Charles M. Connolly, Jr., and Jane V. Chalfin, all of full age. He left a will bearing date the 26th of June, 1865, which was probated before the surrogate of the county of Hew York on the 2d of June, 1869, by which he devised the premises in question as follows: “Fifteenthly. I give and devise unto my beloved wife, Isabella S. Connolly, all the lands and grounds now…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vanderzee v. SlingerlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flanagan v. StaplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Marsh v. Consumers' Park Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- LaRoche v. LaRocheOhio Court of Appeals · 1917
- McCarthy v. HanselOhio Court of Appeals · 1915
- Marsh v. Consumers Park Brewing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.