Legal Opinion
of Traphagen v. Voorhees
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 15, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On application for leave to file a bill of review.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Fleet, V. C.
This is an application for leave to file a bill of review on the-ground of newly-discovered evidence. The case has already been twice heard, first on final hearing, and afterwards it was reheard on the application of the complainant. The subject of the dispute is a sum of money which was paid into court under a decree of interpleader.
The litigation between these parties had its origin in certain transactions, which, for present purposes, may be sufficiently described as follows: The defendant, Peter Voorhees, gave his-bond to Fanny Traphagen, dated March 31st, 1881,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southard v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Jenkins v. EldredgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1845
- Dexter v. ArnoldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1829
- Rubber Co. v. GoodyearSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Livingston v. HubbsNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re KuserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
- St. Georges, C., Soc. v. Society of St. UrzuleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Strong v. StrongNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- 536 Broad St. Corp. v. Valco Mortgage Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Rocca v. RoccaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934