Legal Opinion

Rocca v. Rocca

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 1, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants seek to file a bill of review upon the ground that they have discovered new evidence. The facts which they present, in my opinion, are merely corroborative, and not such as to convince the court that its decree is erroneous. I do not feel that the facts presented would raise a question of such difficulty as to be a fit subject for a judgment in the cause.Traphagen's Ex'r v. Voorhees, 45 N.J. Eq. 41.

The matters set forth in defendants' petition disclose they wish to submit evidence to disprove the testimony of the complainant and his witnesses that the deed was executed in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crandol v. GarrisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. of Traphagen v. VoorheesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1889
  3. St. Georges, C., Soc. v. Society of St. UrzuleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API