Legal Opinion

In re Contribution Rate of the Lord Baltimore Press, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1965No. 39177PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question in the instant case is whether

Lord Baltimore Press (the successor employer) qualifies as a successor in interest to Bichardson Taylor-Globe’s (the predecessor employer) unemployment compensation account as set forth in Section 4141.24 (F), Bevised Code. That section provides, in pertinent part:

“If an employer transfers his business or otherwise reorganizes such business, the successor in interest shall assume the resources and liabilities of such employer’s account, and continue the payment of all contributions due under Sections 4141.01 to 4141.46, inclusive, of the Bevised…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Astral Industries, Inc. v. Indiana Employment Security BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. In re Application of 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Stouffer Hotel Management Corp. v. Ohio Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Makkas v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs. v. Delphi Automotive Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API