Legal Opinion

Makkas v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1985No. 84-1494PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before us necessitates an interpretation of R.C. 4141.24(F). For the following reasons we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

R.C. 4141.24(F) governs the allocation of unemployment compensation liabilities that attach to the purchaser from the sale of part or all of an enterprise. It states:

“If an employer transfers his business or otherwise reorganizes such business, the successor in interest shall assume the resources and liabilities of such employer’s account, and continue the payment of all contributions, or payments in lieu of contributions, due under Chapter 4141 of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kitchen v. ChristmanOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In re Contribution Rate of the Lord Baltimore Press, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Resource Title Agency, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Stouffer Hotel Management Corp. v. Ohio Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Mansfield Plumbing Products, Inc. v. OBESOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API