Michael Allan Durosko v. Samuel A. Lewis Arizona Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Chief Judge:
Durosko appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that his enhanced penalty was a violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy.
Durosko was convicted of two counts of armed robbery. The state sought sentence enhancements under two separate provisions of Arizona law. Both allegations were predicated on the same Texas conviction.
First, the state alleged, pursuant to Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. [hereinafter A.R.S.] § 13-604 (1978), that Durosko had a prior felony conviction. An allegation of a prior felony conviction under § 13-604 is tried to a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- David Ross Delap, Sr. v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- People v. MongeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. LevinIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- James Pettaway v. Charles Plummer, Sheriff of Alameda CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.