State ex rel. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. Scott
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original application for mandamus. cited: G. S., 1873, Sec. 114. Iowa Code, Sec. 1275. Right of eminent domain. JB. & O.R. R. Co. v. Koontz, 4 Am. & Eng. Railroad Cas., 108. Dietrich v. Lincoln & Northwestern R. R. Co., 13 Neb., 361. C., St. P., M. & O. R. R. Co. v. Limdstrom, 16 Id., 254. Right to the lands in question. Gottschallc v. Lincoln & Northwestern R. R. Co., 14 Neb., 390. Mills on Eminent Domain, 351. Hobart v. Ford, 6 Nev., 77. Perm.
Read the full summary
Original application for mandamus. cited: G. S., 1873, Sec. 114. Iowa Code, Sec. 1275. Right of eminent domain. JB. & O.R. R. Co. v. Koontz, 4 Am. & Eng. Railroad Cas., 108. Dietrich v. Lincoln & Northwestern R. R. Co., 13 Neb., 361. C., St. P., M. & O. R. R. Co. v. Limdstrom, 16 Id., 254. Right to the lands in question. Gottschallc v. Lincoln & Northwestern R. R. Co., 14 Neb., 390. Mills on Eminent Domain, 351. Hobart v. Ford, 6 Nev., 77. Perm. R. R. v. N. Y. R. R., 23 N. J. Eq., 157. cited: Rorer on Railroads, 38. Atkinson v. M. & C. R. R., 15 Ohio State, 33. Hull-v. G, B. & Q. R. R., 21…
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
This is an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to require the defendant, Joseph Scott, as commissioner of public-lands-and buildings, to forthwith prepare a deed for execution by the governor of certain lots owned by the state, and to require the governor to execute and deliver the same to the relators. The relators allege in their petition that, “they are corporations duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Nebraska, that the Burlington & Missouri River Railroad Company in Nebraska formerly owned a line of railroad extending from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hancock Ditch Co. v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Heinlin v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Harris v. BeamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Deitrichs v. Lincoln & Northwestern R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Livergood v. RhoadesIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Goldtree v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Bee Building Co. v. DaltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Patterson Orchard Co. v. Southwest Arkansas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- State ex rel. Montana Central Railway Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.