Legal Opinion
The Nationalist Movement v. City of York
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 21, 2007No. 06-2184PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, The Nationalist Movement, challenges the constitutionality of section 741.03 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of York (“section 741.03” or “the Ordinance”), which requires, in certain circumstances, that prospective users of public land within the City file an application, pay certain fees, and agree to a variety of conditions before permission for the use of that land is granted. The District Court ruled that two provisions of the Ordinance were unconstitutional, a ruling the City has not appealed, but the Court upheld the remainder…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Taylor v. Roswell Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- International Women's Day March Planning Committee v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- iMatter Utah v. NjordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Kwong v. BloombergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Kuhns v. City of AllentownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.