Legal Opinion
Tummel & Carroll v. Quinlivan
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 20, 2005No. 05-30137PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:
Tummel & Carroll, a Texas law firm, appeal the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s discharge of Robert Quinlivan’s (“Quinlivan”) debt to Tummel & Carroll. For the reasons discussed below, we remand to the bankruptcy court for findings regarding the relevant state agency law, and whether, under the relevant state agency law, Donald Totten acted as Quinlivan’s agent in securing the services of Tummel & Carroll.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In early 1993, Donald Totten, a California resident, contacted Tummel & Carroll (“T&C”), a general partnership…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- RecoverEdge L.P. v. PentecostCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Strang v. BradnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Stephen Thompson v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of OklahomaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- In re: Benjamin Moonkang HuhUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Credit Union Liquidity Services, L.L.C. v. Green Hills Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Wright v. Minardi (In re Minardi)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2015
- ASARCO, L.L.C. v. Elliott ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.