Legal Opinion

Reichenbach v. Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1937PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

The action seeks a judgment establishing and foreclosing a lien on real property. The realty is located wholly in Nassau county. Although the statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 183, subd. 9) states that such an action must be tried in the county in which the subject of the action or some part thereof is situated, nevertheless, it also provides (Civ. Prac. Act, § 186; Rules Civ. Prac. rule 146) that, although the county designated in the complaint as the place of trial is not the proper county, the action may be tried therein unless the place of trial is changed to the proper county upon timely demand…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Acker v. . LelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Lyman v. Gramercy ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Finch School v. FinchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Goldfeder v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Roerich MuseumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pittman v. MaherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Callanan Industries, Inc. v. Sovereign Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Suddin v. Lynbrook Gardens Co.New York Supreme Court · 1985
  5. A.C.E. Elevator Co. v. V.J.B. Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API