Legal Opinion

Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Roerich Museum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.

We conclude that under section 150 of the General Corporation Law a receiver can only be appointed in an action brought to foreclose a mortgage upon property of a corporation where it appears (1) that the mortgage debt or the interest thereon has been unpaid for thirty days after payment demanded; and (2) that either the income of the property is specifically mortgaged, or the property itself appears to be insufficient to pay the debt.

The statute provides that no receiver can be appointed until thirty days after demand. The requirement of the statute as to default, demand and failure to pay…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reichenbach v. Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. New York Title & Mortgage Co. v. Polk Arms, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Brunner v. SteinhardtNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  4. New York Title & Mortgage Co. v. Polk Arms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Crédito y Ahorro Ponceño v. ArguinzonisSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API