Legal Opinion

State v. Durham

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 10, 1967No. 51653PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONNELLY, Judge.

Appellant, John Hillary Durham, was convicted of statutory rape under § 559.260, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., by a jury in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, and his punishment under the provisions of the Habitual Criminal Act, § 556.-280, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., was assessed at imprisonment for a term of thirty-five years. Following rendition of judgment and imposition of sentence an appeal was perfected to this Court.

Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence. However, a brief summary is in order. Prosecutrix is Flora Jean Young, a female child, who…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Allen v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. State v. TiedtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Rossomanno v. Laclede Cab CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. State v. McO'BlenisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Hagenkord v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. KreckWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API