Legal Opinion
Smith v. Okerson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 7, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
8 N.J. Super. 560 (1950)
73 A.2d 857
KARL M. SMITH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CHARLES OKERSON, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided June 7, 1950.
Mr. Isadore I. Zlotkin, attorney for plaintiff.
Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona & Combs (Mr. Theodore D. Parsons), attorneys for defendants.
BIGELOW, J.A.D.
The equitable problems in this case have become moot, and it is now only an action for damages. The plaintiff is a dairy farmer, and the defendants are potato growers, operating the adjoining farm. The first time there was trouble of the kind complained of was in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Den Norske Ameriekalinje Actiesselskabet v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- East Jersey Water Co. v. BigelowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
- New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
- O'Hara v. NelsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Henry Clay v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- MAJESTIC REALTY ASSOC., INC. v. Toti Contracting Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990