Olentine v. Powell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Muskogee County; John Pi. King, Judge. Action by Eula Olentine against Charles Olentine for divorce. The action was settled by an agreement, and from an allowance of attorney’s fees to George K. Powell and Howell Parks, Charles Olentine brings error. Ford, v. McIntosh et al., 22 Okla: 423.
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
On the 7th day of May, 1908, Eula Olentine, plaintiff below, commenced her action for divorce against Charles Olentine, defendant below, in the district court of Muskogee county. The record discloses that on the 27th day of July, 1908, the action was settled by agreement of tlie parties to re-enter tlie marriage -relation theretofore existing between them, and all other matters in controversy in the action were disposed of by agreement, except the fee that should be paid to the attorneys for Eula Olentine in that action. An agreement was entered into between the attorneys for the parties to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Comrs. Custer Co. v. MoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Sproat v. DurlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Gardenhire v. BurdickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Morris v. CaulkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Bailey v. Bank of MeekerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914