Meyer v. State

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant appeals from a conviction for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, the punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

We find fifteen bills of exception in the record. It is necessary to discuss only the one complaining of the court’s refusal to instruct a verdict of acquittal.

M. M. Vest and his wife were accomplice witnesses as a matter of law. The learned trial judge recognized this and so instructed the jury, together with proper charge relative to required corroboration. It is unnecessary to set out the testimony of Mr. and Mrs. Vest. No matter how complete a case…